• View detailsArticle

    Jeffrey M. Glassman was quoted in a Law360 article published on Oct. 27, 2023...

  • View detailsPresentation

    2023 Louisiana Tax Conference sponsored by the CPA Society of Louisiana (LCPA)...

  • View detailsConference

    2023 Meadows Collier Annual VIRTUAL Tax Conference...

  • View detailsFirm News

    Cristo Rey Dallas Draft Day for the 2023-24 Corporate Work Study Program...

View All
Showing 3 of 10

Meadows, Collier, Reed, Cousins, Crouch & Ungerman, L.L.P.

901 Main Street, Suite 3700
Dallas, TX 75202

Phone: (214) 744-3700
Fax: (214) 747-3732
Toll Free: (800) 451-0093

submit inquiry

Employers Beware: Federal Government Continues its Laser Focus on Employment Tax Fraud

By Michael A. Villa, Jr. on October 27, 2021
According to the IRS Criminal Investigation annual report, there were 2,596 criminal investigations initiated in 2020, of which 298 were employment tax cases. In January 2021, the Department of Justice Tax Division noted “employment tax enforcement is among the Tax Division’s highest priorities.” A recent example of the government’s focus on employment tax fraud can be found in U.S. v. Christina Anglin (W.D. Okla. 2021). Ms. Anglin was the controller and CFO of a technology company in Oklahoma. As the controller, one of her responsibilities was withholding payroll taxes (Social Security and Medicare taxes and federal income taxes) and paying them to the IRS.

She was accused of failing to pay the IRS payroll taxes for the first through third quarters of 2018. She was also accused of approving thousands of dollars of business expenses, including salaries and bonuses, during the same period. On October 22nd, a federal jury found Ms. Anglin guilty of failing to pay the IRS $920,000 in payroll taxes that had been withheld from employees’ paychecks. It is important to note that a criminal conviction of failing to pay payroll taxes does not necessarily require that the employment taxes were used for personal expenses. One might be convicted for failing to pay payroll taxes even if the tax funds are used on other business expenses. The key takeaway from this concept is that absolutely no other expense (including legitimate business expenses and salaries) should be paid with payroll taxes that are required to be paid to the IRS.

Employment tax fraud such as this creates a ripple effect of problems for the government and other potentially innocent third parties. For example, the government gives credit to employee taxpayers for the money their employer allegedly withheld and paid to the IRS. The government treats these payments as if the employer stole the employee’s tax payments from the government. The government will then look to collect the unpaid employment taxes from the business and/or from one of the businesses’ “responsible persons,” if that person willfully failed to collect or pay the employment tax. The portion the government looks to collect from individual responsible persons is referred to as the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty (“TFRP”). A “responsible person” in the eyes of the IRS can potentially be a broad group of people (regardless of whether they are the “bad actor” who stole the employment taxes). For example, the IRS notes a “responsible person” may be:

  • An officer or an employee of a corporation, 
  • A member or employee of a partnership, 
  • A corporate director or shareholder,
  • A member of a board of trustees of a nonprofit organization,
  • Another person with authority and control over funds to direct their disbursement,
  • Another corporation or third party payer,
  • Payroll Service Providers (PSP) or responsible parties within a PSP,
  • Professional Employer Organizations (PEO) or responsible parties within a PEO, or
  • Responsible parties within the common law employer (client of PSP/PEO).
The “responsible person” must also be found to have willfully failed to collect or pay the employment tax. One must examine the specific facts in the case to determine whether the alleged responsible person was aware, or should have been aware of the outstanding taxes, and either intentionally disregarded the law or was indifferent to its requirements (no evil intent or bad motive is required). One trap for the unwary is that potential responsible persons will be asked to complete an interview with the IRS. Oftentimes, potentially “responsible persons” (particularly those who believe they had no evil intent or bad motive) agree to the interview without counsel and admit to things such as knowledge taxes were owed and that other business debts were paid instead of the employment taxes. This type of admission may be enough for the government to pursue the TFRP against this individual. There are many examples in which one officer or controller misappropriated employment taxes, but other third party owners, officers or employees are left to fight the IRS over whether they are personally liable for the TFRP. If you find yourself associated with a business that has unpaid employment taxes, be aware the government has these types of cases at the top of its investigative hit list and you should contact experienced tax counsel at the earliest moment possible.

For any questions on this or any other civil or criminal tax-related matter, please feel free to contact Mike Villa at (214)749-2405 or mvilla@meadowscollier.com.