• View detailsArticle

    HILL TAX BRIEFING: Taxes in Focus Heading Into First 2020 Debate...

  • View detailsPresentation

    2021 Austin Chapter/TXCPA Annual Tax Conference...

  • View detailsConference

    23rd Annual Meadows Collier Tax Conference...

  • View detailsFirm News

    Seven Meadows Collier Attorneys Recognized as 2021 Texas Super Lawyers...

VIEW MOST RECENT
 
 
 
 
 
 
View All
     
Showing 3 of 10

Meadows, Collier, Reed, Cousins, Crouch & Ungerman, L.L.P.

901 Main Street, Suite 3700
Dallas, TX 75202

Phone: (214) 744-3700
Fax: (214) 747-3732
Toll Free: (800) 451-0093

submit inquiry
 
By Joel N. Crouch on October 7, 2021

The Impact of Delinquent International Informational Returns on the IRS Statute of Limitations... [ read ]

Early this year the U.S. Tax Court released a decision in Kelly v. Commissioner, which, among other things, discusses how a delinquent international return impacts the IRS statute of limitations for assessment. It is a welcomed partial win for a taxpayer and contains a good discussion of reliance on a tax professional as the basis for reasonable cause.

By Thomas G. Hineman on September 24, 2021

Ways and Means Proposes Limited "Get Out of S Corp. Free" Card... [ read ]

Do you or your clients have an S corporation that you would like to convert to a limited partnership for tax purposes, but for the taxable gain thereon? Surprisingly, the Ways and Means tax proposals introduced on September 13 would permit a tax-free reorganization from an S corporation to a domestic partnership, with one catch.

By Alan K. Davis on September 15, 2021

Proposed Changes to Gift and Estate Tax Provisions... [ read ]

On September 13, 2021, the House Ways and Means Committee issued a series of proposals for consideration for the payment of the Biden Administration's desired $3.5 Trillion infrastructure Bill. The final legislation will likely look very different than the proposals as issued on Monday. Nevertheless, they are instructive as to the way things may develop over the next few months.

By Joel N. Crouch on September 14, 2021

The Hidden Danger of Filing a Tax Court Petition, Part II... [ read ]

In an earlier blog post, I discussed the hidden danger of filing a Tax Court petition, i.e., that the IRS can raise new issues, including new penalties. In the case referenced in the prior blog post, Wegbreit v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2019-82, the Notice of Deficiency included a 20% negligence penalty, the taxpayer filed a Tax Court petition and after the IRS filed its answer and conducted some discovery, the IRS amended its answer to include 75% civil fraud penalty.

By Joel N. Crouch on September 10, 2021

Court Agrees with Taxpayer and Quashes Summonses to Third-Party Record Keeper... [ read ]

In a rare win for a taxpayer, a federal district court in Idaho turned down an IRS request to enforce third-party summonses for information and granted the taxpayers' motion to quash the summonses. The court said the IRS failed to properly notify the taxpayers of its intent to contact a third party during the course of the examination and therefore, the summonses was not enforceable.

By Joel N. Crouch on September 8, 2021

TIGTA Says the IRS Should Be Pursuing Taxes From S Corporation Owners... [ read ]

The tax treatment of compensation to S-Corp owners has reared its head again in an August 11th report issued by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA). As long as I have practiced tax law, tax treatment of distributions to S corporation shareholders has been an issue with no clear answer. Not surprisingly, the TIGTA report says the IRS should be doing more to examine distributions to S corporation owners.

By Thomas G. Hineman on August 24, 2021

The Magical Metamorphosis of S Corporations Through an F Reorganization... [ read ]

Whether to implement a reincorporation of an S corporation, from say California to Texas, or to pave the way for an S corporation asset sale to a buyer taxed as a partnership, an F reorganization can be a tax efficient tool to achieve those objectives, among others.

By Joel N. Crouch on August 18, 2021

IRS-The 10 Deadly Sins... [ read ]

I've been practicing tax law for more than 30 years helping businesses and individuals resolve disputes with the IRS and I can't tell you how many times a new client has complained about how they were mistreated by the IRS and that IRS employees can do whatever they want because they have lifetime employment. In 1998, in response to the congressional testimony regarding perceived IRS abuse of taxpayers, Congress enacted the 1998 Revenue Reform Act (RRA 98) which, many of us will recall, was intended to make for a kinder and gentler IRS. Taxpayers became "customers" and tax professionals became "partners". I'll leave for another post my thoughts about RRA 98 and whether the IRS became kinder and gentler. What I am addressing today is Section 1203 of RRA 98, a list of 10 actions by an IRS employee that can result in automatic termination of employment, with appeal only to the IRS Commissioner, i.e., the Ten Deadly Sins.

By Joel N. Crouch on August 11. 2021

Musing While Waiting on Hold for Someone at the IRS to Answer My Question... [ read ]

Trying to work out a client's IRS issues these days can be frustrating for the client and the tax professional. You can't throw a stone without hitting a story about delays and problems the IRS is having. I was recently waiting on hold with the IRS hoping to find someone who could help me find out the status of my client's refund claim. While I listened to the "wonderful" hold music that is on a 30 second loop and hoped I would not a get a "courtesy" hang up, I started doing some web surfing and stumbled onto the Taxpayer Advocate Service webpage. At the very top of the TAS webpage is the following: "Refund delayed? Our ability to help may be limited" and a link to a page detailing why the TAS may not be able to help with a delayed refund. Not a good sign.

By Joel N. Crouch on August 10, 2021

Tax Court Petitions and Premature Assessment... [ read ]

When a taxpayer does not agree with tax adjustments proposed by an IRS examiner, the IRS sends the taxpayer a Notice of Deficiency, which gives a taxpayer 90 days to file a petition with the U.S. Tax Court to dispute the proposed adjustments. If the taxpayer files a timely petition, the IRS cannot assess the proposed tax until the case is resolved by the U.S. Tax Court. If a taxpayer does not file a tax court petition, the IRS assesses the tax and the taxpayer is contacted by the IRS collection division for payment.